Heron listens to the conversations you are already in and starts with one thing worth knowing about how you showed up. The summary and the record are there when you need them.

Note takers already capture the words, and that is becoming free. Heron opens with the one observation from that conversation you would not have caught yourself.
HeronThat is the third time you have closed with "let me think about it" with Jordan. Each time, he raised it again the following week.
Heron remembers earlier conversations with the same people, so it can see a pattern that neither of you can see from inside it.
HeronYou made the case three times. The second version was the shortest, and it was the one Dana repeated back.
One observation drawn from the whole hour, not a summary of it. The hard part is choosing which one is worth your attention.
HeronThat went better than your last four with Priya. When she pushed back, you let the pause sit instead of filling it.
Measured against your own history with that person, not against a benchmark or an ideal meeting.
Illustrative examples of the form a notice takes, not output from a real conversation.
The one thing you most need to hear, about you, not the topic. Sometimes a blind spot, sometimes a strength, and when your last Next worked, it tells you first.
How each relationship is going over time, read by who was in the room. A moment that looks bad on its own can read differently given your history, and when Heron is unsure, it asks. Your answer outranks anything it infers.
One thing to change, with a cue for when. Accept it and it comes back as a brief before your next meeting with those people, and that meeting shows whether you did it.
The record you come back to, written to replace your other note takers. Decisions and action items are marked agreed, tentative or floated, with owners and dates, and open commitments carry into the next meeting. The only card meant to be shared.
Ask anything about your meetings, from what was agreed last week to what you owe a colleague, and get a direct answer with each point linked to the moment it came from.
Heron only works if you can be honest in front of it. That constrains what we are willing to build.
Organizations can run Pulse, a separate Next CoLab product with its own deployment and consent. Pulse reports on teams and the organization in aggregate. It does not expose any individual's Heron notices.
A general model can read one transcript and say something sensible about it. That is not the hard part.
The hard part is knowing you. Heron carries your history, your relationships and the arc you are on into every conversation, so the notice it gives you is the one that matters, said in a way that keeps you on your own side.
Underneath it is the Next CoLab behavioral engine, and a context payload that compounds with every conversation you have.
Heron records on your phone, including conversations in person. Past transcripts can be brought in as files; connections to other note takers are coming.
Not a co-pilot. Not a character. A quiet second perspective that is only ever on your side.